Chapter 1 & 2
The historical view towards the Paleolithic era is
that of a primitive people because of the simplicity in their lifestyle and
lack of resources. But I believe because of their simplicity, they were able to
live in a conflict-free society; which makes me wonder what is primitive and
what is sophisticated. One historian wrote these people were the original
affluent society; working fewer hours to meet their material needs. They had a
need for so little, that it afforded them the luxury of time; something we all
crave. For every step forward in progress that we gain in material goods, it
seems there is a step backwards in the ability to live in a society free of
conflict and erosion of our environment
The small bands
of gatherer-hunter were able to survive on a simple diet using tools made from
stone, hence the term, the “old stone age”.
The historians recorded their
presence over 200,000 years ago in Africa and they sustained here 95% of the
time humans have been in existence. They
evolved as Homo sapiens, forming small bands of nomads which moved in a
cyclical, seasonal manner in order to survive. Because of the Ice Age they
eventually migrated out of Africa and into Eurasia about 45,000 years ago
finding warmer regions. Being on the
move they began to make a more sophisticated tool which enabled these people to
begin building boats which allowed migration to Australia, and Indonesia. Because these were people of simple means they
relayed their history through storytelling, cave paintings, ceremonies, and
rituals. The bands of gather-hunters eventually made their way to the Americas
where they began hunting mammals. Some believe the Clovis culture hunted the
mammals to extinction and they were forced to hunt for bison to survive.
The final migration was into the Pacific where there
was intentional colonization. These were simple people but they were smart
enough to carry domestic animals, plants, and make sure both men and women made
the journey which increased their colony and development. Once settling into
colonies, we saw the start of change in the environment. They deliberately set
fires to encourage certain plant growth, they hunted animals to extinction, and
thus begins the extinction of the Neanderthals. The end to the old way of life
surfaced and gatherers and hunters had become the minority.
Next we begin to see the markings of a new era, the Neolithic
age, also known as the “new stone age”.
This was a significant change known as the Agricultural Revolution. This
was a time of cultivation of plants and the taming and breeding of animals;
these were a people that was actively changing nature. The gatherer hunters
were able to settle down into communities and their numbers grew. As the number
of people increased, their need for food increased and their technology for
working the land and hunting animals improved. They needed to support their villages
of people, so the experimentation with the cultivation of crops began. This had a major impact on the environment;
soil began to erode and crops declined. The more food they produced the harder
they worked and their health began to decline.
Signs of conflict began to emerge as the pastorals that could not
produce agricultural products became attracted to the farmers to take their
crops. Society began to change, women still played an important role in the
family, their spinning, weaving, and farming were important contributions, and
some societies traced their lineage through the female, but societies began to
organize into kinship groups and we can see the beginnings of status and change
in gender equality.
The next era of the history of the First
Civilization brings us to Cities, States, and Unequal Societies taking place
3500 B.C.E to 3000 B.C.E. This civilization is in stark contrast to that of the
Paleolithic and Neolithic eras. With the
evolution of civilization in Egypt and Mesopotamia technological advancement
grew along with art, culture, and trade, but for every step forward in
civilization made, we see a decline in the environment, warfare, inequalities,
slavery, gender oppression, and disease.
There were great advancements made during the Agriculture
Revolution; through flood control, irrigation, and drainage, the farmers were
able to create more fertile fields and work the land to produce more crops.
With an urban revolution beginning, we see the start of politics, but there was
inequality that went with it. For every competition or battle, the winners
absorbed the losers, and they became the lower class in society. The wealth
piled up, not out. As we see today, the elite enjoyed the privileges and those
of less fortune were the common laborers. Gone were the days of gender
equality, greater wealth brought status and the women were subordinate to the
men. Public symbols of goddesses were now replaced by male deities. Even the
development of literature brought a status distinction; those that possessed
literacy had greater rank. Writing helped with math and accounting which led to
the collection of taxes for the wealthy and powerful.
For me the ebb and flow of evolution brings the
question, is it inevitable that increase in wealth, power, political
organization causes suffering for the majority while the elite live in a lavish
lifestyle? Will there always be individual
sacrifice for the development for the greater good. I am intrigued that in the
simplest of times there was a respect of all people, and for every stride we
make in innovation and progression of society, we seem to lose respect of the
land and of the people.
Comments
Post a Comment