Blog #7 The Most Recent Century
In
contrast to other eras that were centuries old, the most recent era spans only
one hundred years. Suddenly we’re faced with the globalization of something
new, war. Global division of humankind was created and exists to this very day.
Empire rule diminished and was no longer accepted in the modern world. The
world is faced with population growth greater than seen in past eras, and the
impact on the earth is being felt today and most likely will continue into our
future.
World
War I launched the 21st century. European powers had been competing
for colonies and dominance of land, so it seemed inevitable that war was on the
horizon. Militarism was prestigious and countries were industrializing their
militaries. With Europe consuming so many parts of the world, the growing
troops were not contained just to Europe; they were in Southeast Asia,
Australia, Africa, India, and China. So we start this period with the Great
War, better known as World War I, which had a profound impact United States and
the rest of the world. The U.S. now found itself the center of global power,
the beginnings of a superpower nation.
Postwar
brought with it The Great Depression. What led to this seems to resonate more
and more with our current history; the Crash of 2008. Suddenly more people had wealth and materialism
that conflicted with social and spiritual values. Social inequality becomes
evident to everyone and tensions arise because of the social injustice. It
reminds me of the 2008 crisis because suddenly people become aware that the 1%
remained unscathed, and the remainder of people suffered the consequences of
the 1%’s unethical behavior. Another similarity is that the people believed the
failing economy would regulate itself, but it never did. Doubt prevailed
against a government that evoked capitalist superiority and had now
crumbled. President Roosevelt attempted
to restart the economy with the New Deal, but it never really energized the
economy. It wasn’t until another World War, and the government had to spend
money within these industries which spurred the economy, did the U.S. see a
turnaround. History sees another moment
that changes things forever, the use of an atomic weapon. Within a relatively short period of time in
history, the world had been radically changed. The use of nuclear weapons has changed warfare;
certainly it brought about the cold war between the U.S. and Russia. It is
chilling to think that we are relying on the leaders of these two nations to
keep the world from blowing to bits.
Transformation
of the global economy had taken place which seemed to be inevitable, and this
was secured by the United Nations and World Bank International Monetary Fund.
The world was not going to experience another depression; rules were put in
place to ensure economic globalization and its success. The world became one single business unit and
free global movement would open up opportunities for world trade. As quickly as
the global market grew, so did the instability and inequality. Because of lack
of regulation, financial debt had grown, oil prices soared throughout the 70’s,
and in the 90’s many businesses failed.
The world rebounded and then the housing market seemed to reach new
heights only to suffer a crisis in 2008 that was felt around the world. I still
do not believe everyone has recovered, and many people have not regained their
confidence in the economy to this day.
Strayer
presents a chart on the global development and inequality, which shows a
significant difference between the U.S. and the rest of the world. But what I
find interesting, as much as we lead in every material possession, education,
and quality of life, we are the lowest on the population growth chart. I am not sure what this says other than maybe
we have become more invested in our jobs than in starting a family, or could it
be feminism taking place? It is
interesting that feminism in the west has a different meaning than it does in
Africa. One reason for the slowed population growth could be that women in U.S.
find family and homemaking oppressive, whereas in Africa it gives women a sense
of security.
All
of these revolutionary terms and protests are relative to the region; certainly
what we protest for in our country is different than why people in the Middle
East are protesting. We may be global, but we still lose sight of many international
crisis. I notice the world has become globally socially conscious, but we have also
increased special interest groups and our own sense of entitlement,
simultaneously. Could it be the result of social media and 24/7 news alerts, that
people are being exposed to so much on a daily basis that we cannot possibly
absorb the impact of everything going on around the world?
Comments
Post a Comment